<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tundra v. F150 Comparison 2007 Part III: Ride, Handling, and Comfort</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/</link>
	<description>Toyota Tundra News, Reviews, Accessories, and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:53:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin (Jason)</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-4586</link>
		<dc:creator>admin (Jason)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-4586</guid>
		<description>ICUH8N - Not true. The Denali 6.0 has 375hp. Tundra? 391hp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ICUH8N &#8211; Not true. The Denali 6.0 has 375hp. Tundra? 391hp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-4569</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-4569</guid>
		<description>Both trucks should use real guages instead of C - H or L - H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both trucks should use real guages instead of C &#8211; H or L &#8211; H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-4567</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-4567</guid>
		<description>Eddie good try...Raise the B/S flag. You read up above what edmunds put out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eddie good try&#8230;Raise the B/S flag. You read up above what edmunds put out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-4564</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-4564</guid>
		<description>pups...true and hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pups&#8230;true and hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Bass</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-3522</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Bass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-3522</guid>
		<description>To me, at this time, it all comes down to reliability, safety and fuel economy. I want a truck that has the power when occasionally needed but never at the price of the above. It&#039;s going to be awhile before I buy a new Tundra.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, at this time, it all comes down to reliability, safety and fuel economy. I want a truck that has the power when occasionally needed but never at the price of the above. It&#8217;s going to be awhile before I buy a new Tundra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ICUH8N</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-2648</link>
		<dc:creator>ICUH8N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-2648</guid>
		<description>The article says that the Tundra is the most powerful half ton on the market, actually, the Sierra Denali is the the most powerful half ton on the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article says that the Tundra is the most powerful half ton on the market, actually, the Sierra Denali is the the most powerful half ton on the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pups</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-2452</link>
		<dc:creator>pups</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-2452</guid>
		<description>Why the hell are there all these arguments about which truck is better? Everyone that bought their truck obviously did so for a reason. Saying one truck is better than another is stupid, as they all have their strengths and weaknesses.

enjoy your own truck and shut the hell up.I also do not know about any kind of truck and am speaking out words that my mom told me to write. I got lost on this website when I was looking for little kittens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the hell are there all these arguments about which truck is better? Everyone that bought their truck obviously did so for a reason. Saying one truck is better than another is stupid, as they all have their strengths and weaknesses.</p>
<p>enjoy your own truck and shut the hell up.I also do not know about any kind of truck and am speaking out words that my mom told me to write. I got lost on this website when I was looking for little kittens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-2451</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-2451</guid>
		<description>I think that wag225 is not the smartest one out there. I am not a hugh fan of Ford, but I am sure that it could kick and Tundras buts. And when people use the excuse that Toyota won the truck of the year, you should just put the car of the year, that is all that it won. Any of the other trucks could beat the toyota at towing, and what you get for the price, which is almost all that matters when you are buying a truck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that wag225 is not the smartest one out there. I am not a hugh fan of Ford, but I am sure that it could kick and Tundras buts. And when people use the excuse that Toyota won the truck of the year, you should just put the car of the year, that is all that it won. Any of the other trucks could beat the toyota at towing, and what you get for the price, which is almost all that matters when you are buying a truck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eddie hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-2285</link>
		<dc:creator>eddie hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-2285</guid>
		<description>i have a 1998 f250 light duty with the wierd combo of the 5.4, ifs front, heavy duty brakes, rear axle and tranny and it has reliably towed my kubota tractor and trailer (7060 pounds total) for years. 
i was ready for a new truck and i loved the crewmax for it&#039;s garageability and it&#039;s alleged towing ability. the dealer brought a crewmax 4x4 5.7 with tow package to my office and we hooked it up to my trailer w tractor. from the start, it was noticeably loud as it appeared to struggle to get the load rolling. i thought something must be wrong. i checked the brakes, the tow/haul switch and started off again. i turned to the salesman who was noticeably changing the subject to the dash and seats and other b.s. . i asked if there was a secret button i hadn&#039;t found. he whipped out the brochure and started quoting chapter and verse about &quot;it says here that it tows blah blah blah&quot; .  without a doubt, my old ford with 88,000 miles on an &quot;outdated&quot; engine towed far more confidently than this tundra. the other things that just seemed stupid were the placement and size of the rear view mirror. the front view is really kind of small and when that chunk of crap is on it, seeing signage or getting a good view of the road ahead is not happening.
the headers were cheesy and throaty like a high school kids project junker. if i spend 40,000 on a truck, i don&#039;t need to hear noise, i need to feel power.  it was louder in the cab than any modern diesel i test drove. i run heavy equipment. thats all the noise i want to hear. when i&#039;m going to the job or coming home or taking my family to disney, i don&#039;t want to hear that crap. 
the look of the truck is very submissive next to any other half ton. the f150 4x4 crewcab makes it look like it&#039;s asking for permission. i wanted the crewmax till i gave it a real test run and it was the most overexaggerated vehicle i ever tried. now that the f150 supercrew is increasing it&#039;s cab size and putting a proper diesel in there, it is by far THE TRUCK TO BUY. i&#039;m glad i held out and i&#039;m buying the first f150 diesel crew 4x4 that has the right color. the forward visibility is superb and that matters when you&#039;re towing and reading overpass signs. you really have to ignore the hype and test drive it like you are going to use it. i realized that the commercials, the brochures and the reviews were all inconsistent with it&#039;s real life performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a 1998 f250 light duty with the wierd combo of the 5.4, ifs front, heavy duty brakes, rear axle and tranny and it has reliably towed my kubota tractor and trailer (7060 pounds total) for years.<br />
i was ready for a new truck and i loved the crewmax for it&#8217;s garageability and it&#8217;s alleged towing ability. the dealer brought a crewmax 4&#215;4 5.7 with tow package to my office and we hooked it up to my trailer w tractor. from the start, it was noticeably loud as it appeared to struggle to get the load rolling. i thought something must be wrong. i checked the brakes, the tow/haul switch and started off again. i turned to the salesman who was noticeably changing the subject to the dash and seats and other b.s. . i asked if there was a secret button i hadn&#8217;t found. he whipped out the brochure and started quoting chapter and verse about &#8220;it says here that it tows blah blah blah&#8221; .  without a doubt, my old ford with 88,000 miles on an &#8220;outdated&#8221; engine towed far more confidently than this tundra. the other things that just seemed stupid were the placement and size of the rear view mirror. the front view is really kind of small and when that chunk of crap is on it, seeing signage or getting a good view of the road ahead is not happening.<br />
the headers were cheesy and throaty like a high school kids project junker. if i spend 40,000 on a truck, i don&#8217;t need to hear noise, i need to feel power.  it was louder in the cab than any modern diesel i test drove. i run heavy equipment. thats all the noise i want to hear. when i&#8217;m going to the job or coming home or taking my family to disney, i don&#8217;t want to hear that crap.<br />
the look of the truck is very submissive next to any other half ton. the f150 4&#215;4 crewcab makes it look like it&#8217;s asking for permission. i wanted the crewmax till i gave it a real test run and it was the most overexaggerated vehicle i ever tried. now that the f150 supercrew is increasing it&#8217;s cab size and putting a proper diesel in there, it is by far THE TRUCK TO BUY. i&#8217;m glad i held out and i&#8217;m buying the first f150 diesel crew 4&#215;4 that has the right color. the forward visibility is superb and that matters when you&#8217;re towing and reading overpass signs. you really have to ignore the hype and test drive it like you are going to use it. i realized that the commercials, the brochures and the reviews were all inconsistent with it&#8217;s real life performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blaineguy</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-2242</link>
		<dc:creator>blaineguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2007/03/24/tundra-v-f150-comparision-%e2%80%94-part-iii-ride-handling-and-comfort/#comment-2242</guid>
		<description>It is simple to see that the tundra simply copied the design of the 2004 f150.  They have a adopted the same frame concept, same center shift, same tailgate assist, same reverse camera, same box style, same brake system, same ride quality,etc.  That being said, toyota was very smart to model their truck towards the F150.  

Toyota is on the right path, but you cann&#039;t expect toyota to come into this kind of marketplace and have a hands down &quot;best truck&quot;. Ford&#039;s f150 has been their bread and butter for a good reason. They know what the truck buyer wants.  The new 2009 f150 will set another benchmark for GM and Toyota to copy four years later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is simple to see that the tundra simply copied the design of the 2004 f150.  They have a adopted the same frame concept, same center shift, same tailgate assist, same reverse camera, same box style, same brake system, same ride quality,etc.  That being said, toyota was very smart to model their truck towards the F150.  </p>
<p>Toyota is on the right path, but you cann&#8217;t expect toyota to come into this kind of marketplace and have a hands down &#8220;best truck&#8221;. Ford&#8217;s f150 has been their bread and butter for a good reason. They know what the truck buyer wants.  The new 2009 f150 will set another benchmark for GM and Toyota to copy four years later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
