<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: K and N Air Filter Review: Save $1100 On Gas!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/07/16/k-and-n-air-filter-review-save-1100-on-gas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/07/16/k-and-n-air-filter-review-save-1100-on-gas/</link>
	<description>Toyota Tundra News, Reviews, Accessories, and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:52:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/07/16/k-and-n-air-filter-review-save-1100-on-gas/#comment-12652</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/?p=333#comment-12652</guid>
		<description>Jason-I did the modification on Friday.  So far, it seems that truck is much more responsive and lively.  It appears that it is breathing easier.  Not sure if it is directly related the the k &amp; n or the charcoal screen delete, but definetely the combanation seems to have improved the intake some.  I still assume a CAI system would make my truck more responsive with a slight hp gain and at least another mpg +.

I will try to observe over the next few weeks and let you know if I experience any mpg increase with current mod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason-I did the modification on Friday.  So far, it seems that truck is much more responsive and lively.  It appears that it is breathing easier.  Not sure if it is directly related the the k &amp; n or the charcoal screen delete, but definetely the combanation seems to have improved the intake some.  I still assume a CAI system would make my truck more responsive with a slight hp gain and at least another mpg +.</p>
<p>I will try to observe over the next few weeks and let you know if I experience any mpg increase with current mod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/07/16/k-and-n-air-filter-review-save-1100-on-gas/#comment-12638</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/?p=333#comment-12638</guid>
		<description>Ralph - Great - do you think the throttle response is better?

Rob - Thanks for your comments man - if you feel like leaving a review of the filter here I would be very grateful: http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/review/kn-air-filter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralph &#8211; Great &#8211; do you think the throttle response is better?</p>
<p>Rob &#8211; Thanks for your comments man &#8211; if you feel like leaving a review of the filter here I would be very grateful: <a href="http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/review/kn-air-filter" rel="nofollow">http://www.tundraheadquarters......air-filter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/07/16/k-and-n-air-filter-review-save-1100-on-gas/#comment-12612</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/?p=333#comment-12612</guid>
		<description>I have a 2003 toyota tundra w/the 4.7.  I installed the k&amp;n air filter and I was very pleased with the results of the throttle response and horsepower that I gained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a 2003 toyota tundra w/the 4.7.  I installed the k&amp;n air filter and I was very pleased with the results of the throttle response and horsepower that I gained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/07/16/k-and-n-air-filter-review-save-1100-on-gas/#comment-12520</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/?p=333#comment-12520</guid>
		<description>Thanks once again Jason.  I still plan on doing at cold air intake, but will try to hold off and felt this is a descent compromise for now ( and much easier to explain to the wife! ).

By the way after my last visit to the dealership with regards to the gas pedal recall issue the shop foreman said that he had no problem with the &quot;charcoal filter removal&quot; .  He said it was there to help control emissions, but that it would not; a) void warranty  b) cause a failed vehicle emission inspection c) cause any damage to the engine.  

I plan on doing both, k&amp;n &amp; charcoal delete tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks once again Jason.  I still plan on doing at cold air intake, but will try to hold off and felt this is a descent compromise for now ( and much easier to explain to the wife! ).</p>
<p>By the way after my last visit to the dealership with regards to the gas pedal recall issue the shop foreman said that he had no problem with the &#8220;charcoal filter removal&#8221; .  He said it was there to help control emissions, but that it would not; a) void warranty  b) cause a failed vehicle emission inspection c) cause any damage to the engine.  </p>
<p>I plan on doing both, k&amp;n &amp; charcoal delete tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/07/16/k-and-n-air-filter-review-save-1100-on-gas/#comment-12516</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/?p=333#comment-12516</guid>
		<description>Ralph - It&#039;s pre-oiled at the factory. The cleaning procedure (every 25-50k miles) is to wash and then re-oil the filter. It&#039;s ready to go out of the box, and it&#039;s definitely a great buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralph &#8211; It&#8217;s pre-oiled at the factory. The cleaning procedure (every 25-50k miles) is to wash and then re-oil the filter. It&#8217;s ready to go out of the box, and it&#8217;s definitely a great buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/07/16/k-and-n-air-filter-review-save-1100-on-gas/#comment-12511</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/?p=333#comment-12511</guid>
		<description>Jason,

Hey I know have a question with regards to the k &amp; n drop in filter.  I think I am going to go this route first due to cost factor.  I am a little confused though by the comments of &quot;pre-oiling&quot; this filter before inserting it.  I thought K&amp;N&#039;s performance air-filter (part no.33-2387) came ready to install.  Is it ready to install or is there any prep work required?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>Hey I know have a question with regards to the k &amp; n drop in filter.  I think I am going to go this route first due to cost factor.  I am a little confused though by the comments of &#8220;pre-oiling&#8221; this filter before inserting it.  I thought K&amp;N&#8217;s performance air-filter (part no.33-2387) came ready to install.  Is it ready to install or is there any prep work required?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THUNDER ROAD</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/07/16/k-and-n-air-filter-review-save-1100-on-gas/#comment-11512</link>
		<dc:creator>THUNDER ROAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/?p=333#comment-11512</guid>
		<description>i got the K&amp;N 63 Series air filter. bought two filter so one can dry. when the other one is on the truck.  i got a mbrp performance exhaust both sound good together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i got the K&amp;N 63 Series air filter. bought two filter so one can dry. when the other one is on the truck.  i got a mbrp performance exhaust both sound good together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin (Jason)</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/07/16/k-and-n-air-filter-review-save-1100-on-gas/#comment-7466</link>
		<dc:creator>admin (Jason)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/?p=333#comment-7466</guid>
		<description>Carl - I thought you were referring to the filter in the bottom of the air box lid (hence the term air box cover). I haven&#039;t noticed that filter before - perhaps it&#039;s exclusive to the 4.7. The only functions I can possibly think of is that it either somehow protects the MAF sensor (which I sincerely doubt) or it&#039;s designed to absorb moisture (also doubt that as well). I can&#039;t think of any reason for it&#039;s existence - if the air filter is doing it&#039;s job, there&#039;s no purpose in a second filter in the tube. I say remove it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl &#8211; I thought you were referring to the filter in the bottom of the air box lid (hence the term air box cover). I haven&#8217;t noticed that filter before &#8211; perhaps it&#8217;s exclusive to the 4.7. The only functions I can possibly think of is that it either somehow protects the MAF sensor (which I sincerely doubt) or it&#8217;s designed to absorb moisture (also doubt that as well). I can&#8217;t think of any reason for it&#8217;s existence &#8211; if the air filter is doing it&#8217;s job, there&#8217;s no purpose in a second filter in the tube. I say remove it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Sampson</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/07/16/k-and-n-air-filter-review-save-1100-on-gas/#comment-7448</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Sampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/?p=333#comment-7448</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the quick response. The filter I&#8217;m referring to is down stream in the air flow path, meaning the intake air has already been filtered by the air filter so I don&#8217;t know what your comment of &#8220;to block any really big “junk” from getting into the paper filter&#8221; means. Any big &#8220;junk&#8221; is caught by the regular paper (or K&amp;N) air filter. All I can think of is that this second filter,  filters the air again after passing through the &#8220;main&#8221; air filter but since it&#8217;s non-replaceable, it must not ever clog up with dirt so I still don&#8217;t understand it&#8217;s function. It would make sense that if this second filter was removed, air flow would increase as would the intake noise. Am I correct or am I missing someting?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin (Jason)</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/07/16/k-and-n-air-filter-review-save-1100-on-gas/#comment-7432</link>
		<dc:creator>admin (Jason)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/?p=333#comment-7432</guid>
		<description>Carl - That filter has two purposes. First, it&#039;s meant to block any really big &quot;junk&quot; from getting into the paper filter. Second, it&#039;s a noise reducer. Removing this filter is an easy way to boost your stock intake&#039;s power, but unless you also replace the stock paper air filter with something more durable, it&#039;s a bad idea to remove it. Does that make sense (I don&#039;t think I explained it very well)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl &#8211; That filter has two purposes. First, it&#8217;s meant to block any really big &#8220;junk&#8221; from getting into the paper filter. Second, it&#8217;s a noise reducer. Removing this filter is an easy way to boost your stock intake&#8217;s power, but unless you also replace the stock paper air filter with something more durable, it&#8217;s a bad idea to remove it. Does that make sense (I don&#8217;t think I explained it very well)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
