Comments on: Car and Driver Long Term Tundra Review

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:22:49 +0000

Consumer reports is pretty good for everything but automobiles. They have an uneducated automotive opinion and feel it is their duty to share it with everyone. Why test when you can spew lies and fabricated setups to the unsuspecting public.

Consumer Reports: Great for toasters, Bad for cars.

By: admin (Jason)

admin (Jason) — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:54:38 +0000

So C&D isn’t too popular around here. Consumer Reports has been pushing baffling logic for a long time too, but at least they do some data analysis.

By: Joey

Joey — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:21:52 +0000

Plus one to Jeremy and Jason’s comments =)

By: Mickey

Mickey — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:01:39 +0000

I too quit C/D awhile back. Also quit Consumer reports on their B/S review. It makes you wonder if the automaker has to pay these mags for a good write up.

By: patrick

patrick — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:18:09 +0000

Is there a locker for the new tundra yet? and when is toyota going to design one? Sorry a little off topic…

By: admin (Jason)

admin (Jason) — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:44:43 +0000

Now I see – it’s all so clear. I stopped getting C&D myself a few years ago because they can’t stop choking themselves while driving $200k sports cars that have little or no relevance to me, then complaining that the latest Ford Focus doesn’t have enough “grunt” compared to a Maybach. Puh-lease.

By: Jeremy Breaux

Jeremy Breaux — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:30:35 +0000

You have to understand, Trucks are the sole cause of Global Warmining, The fuel crisis, Autisim, Hang Nails, Downs Syndrome, Flatulance, and Hurricanes. That is why Car and Driver was so harsh on it. How dare the American public work hard and be willing to pay for the vehicle they want.

I canceled my subscription to Crack and Dribble years ago. They became irrelivant decades ago.