<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Ford Replace The Ranger With &#8220;F150 Light?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/10/23/ford-ranger-replacement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/10/23/ford-ranger-replacement/</link>
	<description>Toyota Tundra News, Reviews, Accessories, and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:16:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/10/23/ford-ranger-replacement/#comment-9471</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/?p=352#comment-9471</guid>
		<description>can you go out whith me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you go out whith me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/10/23/ford-ranger-replacement/#comment-4817</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/?p=352#comment-4817</guid>
		<description>Jeremy you are probably right. It&#039;s survival. Also with the Camary passing F-150 sales will be a hard one to swallow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy you are probably right. It&#8217;s survival. Also with the Camary passing F-150 sales will be a hard one to swallow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingle</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/10/23/ford-ranger-replacement/#comment-4814</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/?p=352#comment-4814</guid>
		<description>back to the 70&#039;s!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>back to the 70&#8217;s!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/2008/10/23/ford-ranger-replacement/#comment-4811</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tundraheadquarters.com/blog/?p=352#comment-4811</guid>
		<description>I think Ford is taking the right steps to insure long term survival.  In the day of expensive fuel a smaller, friendlier truck makes more sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Ford is taking the right steps to insure long term survival.  In the day of expensive fuel a smaller, friendlier truck makes more sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.888 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-19 05:55:53 -->
